Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark Tremayne's avatar

Using multiple assets to move up into the teens seems a lot riskier (player may or may not ever be great) than using multiple assets to trade for a known great player. I’m fixated on a deal with the Cavs because they have two star point guards that are 6-1” and may have realized that small back court will always cap them defensively. Also they are desperate for high quality wings. Maybe under the new CBA this isn’t a great way to build though.

Expand full comment
Andrew Lyons's avatar

Really great analysis. Appreciate that these are credible (not totally "pie in the sky) scenarios.

I think the Miami trade suggestion involving Oladipo seems particularly realistic.

That one that would work for both teams. I could easily see the Heat looking to get out of the first round this year to take advantage of an early 2nd at #33 at a reduced cost, especially if they could move off 'Dipo's contract and get a pick next year, when they might better know where they stand w/ their vets.

Would love for SA to offer them the CHA pick- I think the TOR one might end up being pretty decent- but if SA's preferred guy is there at #18, it might be worth parting with the Raptor one instead, or maybe even the Spurs' own pick (though that's risky). I don't think Wallace, Bufkin, or Hood-Schifino will be there that late but if one of them is...

Expand full comment
15 more comments...

No posts